tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21221307507861820822023-11-15T06:16:32.423-08:00A Look At Americans From the View Of A Government EmployeeI just couldn't resist a little gloating!!youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-69785367770346397462019-05-05T10:22:00.002-07:002019-05-05T10:41:08.028-07:00We Have Assumed the Power to Assign Right-and-Wrong Morality as We See Fit<span id="docs-internal-guid-7e4d99d1-7fff-9de4-21e6-e48f99415ac9" style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px;">In medieval times it was not </span><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px;">out of the ordinary for the Catholic Church to allow selected persons exemptions from moral law. Higher ranking members were allowed “privileges” that would never be tolerated when done by o</span><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px;">rdinary church subjects. These exemptions were issued at the sole, unaccountable discretion of the Catholic Church, regardless of any conflict with the founder of the Church, Jesus Christ. A monopoly on morality being very lucrative, Catholicism even created the market for moral exemptions, or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indulgence" target="_blank">Indulgences</a>, for sins.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px;"><br />Today, we at the government have taken your sense of patriotism, and twisted it to grant ourselves the same moral authority possessed by the medieval Catholic Church. We’ve even got you people vigorously defending our right to do whatever we want to you. You never tolerate illegal kidnapping and torture when done by your next door neighbor; many parents live in fear of such happening to their children. You same people cheer us on as we, with no accountability whatsoever, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/09/us/09secrets.html" target="_blank">extraordinarily rendition</a> people to be tortured, or simply kill them. You go to great lengths to demonize the likes of Ted Bundy and others, but when the kidnappers have our Federal Blessing, you enthusiastically defend their actions. Your “patriotic” cries for “justice” against those we deem evil are not dampened in the slightest by your own knowledge of our disregard for our laws, Constitution, and moral principles. We have made our continued killing too important to you.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px;"><br />Consider our own drone strikes in Pakistan. The Brookings Institute has USA drone strikes <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/do-targeted-killings-work-2/" target="_blank">killing an estimated 10 civilians for every one militant</a> as the running average. Imagine if the Taliban was still at war with Russia, and Russia determined that Taliban members were hiding out in Florida. Consider your reaction if Russia, without permission, or even informing the USA, began bombing the Floridian neighborhoods in which these Taliban suspects reside with full knowledge of the resulting innocent casualties. This would be considered an atrocity and an act of war. We at the US government do the same to Pakistan every day, and lose no sleep over the lives of those innocent Pakistanis. We do such under our own Federal Blessing, so our actions cannot possibly be wrong on moral, ethical, or any other grounds. Our consciences are clear.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px;"><br />The American Indians defended themselves against an aggressive, invading force. They had been labeled “evil” by us in government, and our assaults against them labeled “good.” After exerting our moral authority to steal their land, the justice of the Indian cause became irrelevant. This is how we running the USA were able to pull off what is arguably the world’s greatest and most successful holocaust with no significant resistance on moral or humanitarian grounds.<br /><br />We can even grant ourselves the moral authority to exempt ourselves, or remove our moral exemption retroactively. Consider the case of the Japanese American in the 40’s. Japanese Americans were kidnapped, had their homes confiscated, and placed in detention camps by us at the government. This would have been viewed as horrifically unjust if done by anyone acting without our Federal Blessing (imaging the public outcry if Boeing attempted this), but we met little resistance after exempting ourselves from moral law. To buy more of your loyalty we retroactively removed our Federal Blessing on this specific act. Today it is viewed as a horrible injustice because and only because we Feds removed our Blessing. You people view the treatment of Japanese Americans in the 40’s as an injustice entirely due to our removal of our Blessing.<br /><br />We’ve begun to delegate Blessing authority to increasingly low levels. Here, Mr. Richard Barnes refused to allow one of our government employees to enter his home. Mr. Barnes reasoned that he had some mythical right to refuse entry to a government employee who did not have a warrant. When the government employee tried to force his way into Barnes’ home, Barnes demonstrated his extreme anti Americanism by going so far as to push the officer. The Indiana State Supreme Court, taking care of its own in government, said "<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/55478579/Supreme-Court-Ruling-Barnes-vs-State" target="_blank">We hold that there is -no right- to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers</a>.” Regardless of that fact that Unlawful Entry is a crime, Barnes will be the one punished for his insubordination to the government.<br /><br />Nazi Germany delegated such authority to its SS officers and Gestapo. We at the US Government are not far behind.<br /><br />The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty<br />- John Adams</span>youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-15776440129625129942015-12-13T14:59:00.000-08:002015-12-13T15:31:49.613-08:00You People are the Government's Cattle<br />
<div class="p1">
<span class="s1">You people think you are free. You study American history and learn how your forefathers fought against an oppressive king and won their freedom. You may even read their warnings about guarding freedom, about how the domestic government can slowly erode liberty while the people don’t even notice. I have news for you; it has already happened. We at the government have already assumed ownership of your bodies, and, even better for us, we rent them back to you for quite a bit of cash.<br />
Income tax. It’s the law, the law we made to claim a right to assume ownership of a percentage of your income forever. “How can there be a law that gives one person or organization the right to take money from other persons and organizations without their consent?” You may ask. Easy, we at the government exercise such a high degree of control over you that it is in effect a claim of ownership on you, much like a master / slave relationship. In terms of medicine, food and water, etc., we control what you put in your bodies, where and how you travel, what you learn and are taught to believe in our schools, what sorts of medical care you are allowed to access, etc etc. We publicly subject you to </span><a href="http://youareproperty.blogspot.com/2015_05_01_archive.html" target="_blank"><span class="s2" style="color: blue;"></span><span class="s2" style="color: blue;">gross personal violations</span></a><span class="s1"> </span><span class="s1">that would NEVER be tolerated if done by someone other than your owners. Our ownership of you is further evidenced by your acceptance of the high degree of control we exercise over you; you don’t ever think to assert that we have no right to treat you as we do. If we own you, without question we also own your earnings.</span><br />
<span class="s1">
If you do not pay the tax debt we assign to you we will send our IRS agents to help you pay. They will help you by confiscating your money, income, property, and even future earnings. The proceeds will be credited to your tax liability. If this looting is not sufficient to collect the debt our laws assign to you, we will simply repossess “your” body by placing you in one of our prisons. If you do not pay whatever price we demand to rent and enjoy the use of “your” body, you cannot have it. You see, we really do own you. You belong to us. We have </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_incarceration_rate" target="_blank"><span class="s2" style="color: blue;"></span><span class="s2" style="color: blue;">room for millions</span></a><span class="s1"> </span><span class="s1">of you in our prisons. </span><br />
<span class="s1"><span class="s1">If we assume a high degree of control over you, and can forcefully place you in our custody if you do not pay whatever price we demand, well, doesn’t that sound like an owner renting his property to a lessee? We at the government assumed ownership of your bodies and you were completely oblivious. </span><a href="http://youareproperty.blogspot.com/2014/10/no-you-havent-got-house.html" target="_blank"><span class="s2" style="color: blue;"></span><span class="s2" style="color: blue;">We did the same thing to your homes</span></a><span class="s1">, and, of course, you didn’t notice that either, much less stand up for yourselves.<br />
Another view is that freedom is a commodity that we at the government monopolize, and rent to you people for profit. Take your pick, it’s a win win for us at the government.<br />
<br />
"How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think."<br />
- Adolf Hitler</span></span></div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-79117800523229300492015-05-20T21:32:00.001-07:002015-05-20T21:51:40.226-07:00TSA to America: “Shut Up and Spread Your Legs.”<br />
<div class="p1">
This entry serves as an announcement to the American general public. We at the government, specifically TSA, are going to be conducting much more thorough checks of you people seeking commercial air transportation. Many of you will not like the more personal searches, but we don’t care. We at the government have decided to proceed without your consent. We have offered you a choice, you can choose between being viewed naked by us or having us give you a thorough pat down, necessarily including breast and genital fondling. You have no further say over how we search your bodies; your obligation is to comply and continue believing it is for your own good. We don’t expect much resistance from you people.<br />
You should have made a few changes in preparation by now. Consider the lesson you used to teach your children. It went something like: “Nobody can touch or see your private area except for the family doctor we choose.” Now you should be responsible parents and prepare your children for exposure to our TSA employees. Consider a more fitting lesson: “Remember, only the doctor and government employees can touch or see your private area, and saying no to a government employee can get you, Mommy or Daddy thrown in jail.” If you don’t think your 8 year old son or 13 year old daughter needs to choose between being viewed naked by us or having one of us feel your child’s breasts and genitals, you are going to have to be a good little American and get over it. Just looked what <a href="http://articles.philly.com/2015-02-05/news/58800950_1_carry-on-bag-screener-terminal-b" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">we did to </span></a><span class="s1"><a href="http://articles.philly.com/2015-02-05/news/58800950_1_carry-on-bag-screener-terminal-b" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">this man</span></a> when he protested</span>. He was very lucky.<span style="color: blue;"> <a href="http://politicaloutcast.com/2015/01/tsa-still-hasnt-caught-terrorist/#" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">We might <span class="s1">not have caught a terrorist</span> yet</span></a></span>, but we have caught thousands of you people not complying with us. It’s going to get much worse for you if you people resist.<br />
You Americans would never allow anyone in a mall, sidewalk, or other public place to freely place others under duress in order to feel their breasts and genitals for any reason; you would immediately call on us at the government to remove that person. We have conditioned you to not only accept, but welcome that same sexual assault as long as it is carried out by us at the government. We have trained you to not only allow, but thank us as we take liberties with your bodies that many would consider offensive even to discuss, and you believe we do this for your own good. In fact, according to our in house poll mo<span style="background-color: white;">st of you</span><span style="background-color: white; color: blue;"> </span><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/156491/americans-views-tsa-positive-negative.aspx" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">invite the oppression</span></a><span style="background-color: white; color: blue;">.</span><span style="background-color: white;"> The “men” of A</span>merica will even surrender their wives and daughters to be viewed naked or fondled by us as we see fit with little to no resistance. Consider this disloyal woman's paraphrased statement: “For a sane person in a sane country, the following statement should be true <span style="color: blue;">‘<a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/nov/17/tsa-patdowns-scanner" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;"><span class="s1">My freely chosen bedmates and doctors are the only ones allowed to see my naked body or touch my genitalia</span>.</span></a>’</span> Wrong. You people no longer have the right to such dignity and respect here in the USA. This woman might talk big and tough behind the internet, but I guarantee when we tell her to shut up and spread her legs, she’ll fall right in line with the rest of you good little Americans. You people always do, it’s the American way. I guess chivalry really is dead, thanks to us.<br />
Here’s a question for you; what kind of a man knowingly surrenders his own daughter to one of us government workers to be molested, standing by passively even as her private parts are fondled while she screams “Daddy Daddy, please help me!” Punch line: an American man. I speak only to you men when I say you gutless cowards will be lining up to hand over your wives and daughters in our airports, it will happen hundreds of time each day across our USA. You had better start explaining to your children that we government employees are allowed to touch their private parts whenever we want; it will make the whole thing a lot less dramatic.<br />
There is nothing wrong with us treating you as such because we are both<span class="s1"> <a href="http://youareproperty.blogspot.com/2014/11/we-are-exempt-from-your-morality.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">immune and exempt from your morality and laws</span></a></span>, even those laws intended to prevent sexual assault. Your bodies are in effect our bodies. It is you who have no right to not allow us to see you naked or fondle you. It does not matter if sexual molestation by our TSA employees causes psychological harm to your children lasting decades into adulthood. We are immune from any and all legal consequences and will not be deterred. If your child is damaged by our screening process, it is very likely because you poisoned your child’s mind against the United States government. In such a case we may have your states Child Protective Services consider whether or not you are fit to be parents.<br />
It doesn’t matter to you if TSA <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/26/tsa-agents-background-checks_n_1456849.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">background checks are <span class="s1">not adequate or incomplete</span></span></a> when employment begins. You do not care if those hands on your loved ones body could be<span style="color: blue;"> <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/priest-defrocked-for-child-sex-abuse-now-works-for-tsa-report-says/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">those of a sex offender</span></a>. </span>We know it doesn’t matter to you because you will still choose to submit to our authority as government employees. What occupation could possibly be more appealing to a pedophile or sex offender?<br />
Hear this warning; we will not tolerate any of you spouting off about your rights under the constitution. We are not interested in your rants about unreasonable searches and seizures without a warrant. We do not care if you think allowing four ounces of unidentified fluid per traveler times four accomplices equates to one pound of explosives slipping right under our noses; WE are the professionals. Your idiocy does not deter us, and can get you fined or thrown in jail. Consider that the <span class="s1"><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/11/19/airport.security.issues/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">majority of Americans</span></a> </span>want us at the government to exercise our right to intimately search anyone and everyone we want. We took our oaths as federal employees to support and defend <span class="s1">our constitution</span>, not you, so you will leave the constitution to us.<br />
Never before have there been a people more difficult to control, more resistant to tyranny than early Americans. Never before have a people been more easily submitted, controlled, and dominated than you modern Americans. This unprecedented change we’ve made in your minds over just 234 years is a testament to our amazing success at the government. And we did it all while convincing you that you’re still free!!<br />
<br />
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.<br />
- 4th Amendment of the document that once constituted the USA.</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-82371954788217343312015-04-03T12:00:00.000-07:002015-04-03T12:01:14.037-07:00The Constitution Says Whatever Our Judges Say It Says<br />
<div class="p1">
The Constitution of the United States; it’s what “constitutes” the United States. It is America. It’s also ours. We have the authority and precedence to interpret the US Constitution however we want. There’s nothing you can do about it, our judges are on our side. Any defendant or juror who stands up to us may find himself fined or jailed for contempt of court.<br />
Judges are our last and final safeguard against constitutional restrictions on our power such as jury nullification, and they are quite effective. Jurors will convict anyone we direct them to under threat of contempt, the accompanying indefinite confinement is a powerful motivating tool at our disposal. You cowardly people always cave under our threats, handing the accused over to us to save your own necks even though you know they do not deserve prison. Just look what<span class="s1"> we did to Irwin Schiff</span>. Even if you are on our side of the Schiff trial, you can clearly see that <a href="http://www.takelifeback.com/irwin/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Judge Kent Dawson did not allow Schiff a fair trial</span></a>. Judge Dawson is one of us and working for us, not you. We at the government own the jurors. We just keep the jury system in place because you people fall for the illusion of the freedom and protection it offers. It keeps you compliant and in line, and, when we accuse you of a crime and disallow your defense, will keep the rest of your peers on our side. They will believe you deserve however many years of prison we dictate.<br />
Through our judges we at the government are able to have our way with you people. <span class="s1"><a href="http://mises.org/library/tyranny-bench" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Here is a judge who ordered a 15 year old girl by the name of Linda Kay Spitler to be sterilized like a dog</span></a> </span>without her knowledge or consent. The judge, Judge Harold D. Stump, enjoys <span class="s1">complete and eternal immunity</span> from any and all legal retribution for his act, as do all participating parties.<br />
Do you really think we want you to own arms? Do you think we want you to act as constitutionally informed jurors and interfere with our conviction ambitions? Why on earth would we want you to be exempt from our surveillance? Do we really want to be held back by an obsolete piece of paper? Just give it some time and our steady erosion of what is left of your freedoms will finish off the aforementioned scrap of paper.<br />
Your USA may once have been the “land of the free, home of the brave,” but now it is the land of the coerced, because of the cowardly. And it is now our USA, not yours. If you think you are free, take a look around you. We Feds control everything of consequence.<br />
<br />
The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they may please. It should be remembered, as an axiom of eternal truth in politics, that whatever power in any government is independent, is absolute also; in theory only, at first, while the spirit of the people is up, but in practice, as fast as that relaxes.<br />
- Thomas Jefferson</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-4703908623993250342015-04-03T11:31:00.002-07:002015-04-03T11:49:18.626-07:00We're Building An Economic Iron Curtain Around the USA<div class="p1">
“No, this isn’t the USSR, we’re a free country, remember, it’s ‘the land of the free?’ Nobody can tell people in a free country what to do with their own money.” That’s right, we taught you in our schools that America is a free country, so, no matter what happens here, you will always be free if you are in America. Go on keep believing it. It doesn’t matter that in 2000 presidential candidate John Kerry ran on, among other things, setting up what was in effect an <span class="s1">economic Iron Curtain</span>. Now, our own <span class="s1">Senator Carl Levin</span> has taken it a step further and is pursuing individual Americans, that’s right, you people, for the same thing. And he’s leading our assault against your few remaining freedoms.</div>
<div class="p2">
Here is what we have to say about you Americans who fail to tell us what you are doing with your own money by filling out our Foreign Bank Account Report (FBAR):<br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; line-height: 16.0029983520508px;"><i><a href="http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-&-Self-Employed/Report-of-Foreign-Bank-and-Financial-Accounts-FBAR" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Those required to file an FBAR who fail to properly file a complete and correct FBAR may be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 per violation for nonwillful violations that are not due to reasonable cause. For willful violations, the penalty may be the greater of $100,000 or 50 percent of the balance in the account at the time of the violation, for each violation. </span></a></i></span><br />
<br />
That’s right, we assigned ourselves the right to take $10,000 or more of your money EACH time you don’t report your foreign holdings to us on the form we dictate. No, it doesn’t matter if you simply didn’t know about our requirement. NO, you Mexican Americans who maintain a bank account in Mexico are NOT free to just quietly keep this money in Mexico. NO, you are not free to invest your money through a foreign brokerage without telling us about the funds. It doesn’t matter if the US dollar and economy are slowly collapsing and you feel a need to safeguard your earnings for the sake of your family, you must go down with the ship. You MUST disclose your holdings to us at the government as soon as the balance exceeds our threshold, otherwise we will come after you for breaking our laws. One more thing, between you and us, guess who gets to decide if your failure to file was willful or not???<br />
We presume you guilty unless and until you can prove your innocence. Our laws assume each and every foreign asset you own is intended to launder crime proceeds or hide money from our IRS, and we treat you appropriately. "Innocent until proven guilty" may be in your constitution, but that's never stopped us before. Soon, we’ll be going after that timeshare in Mexico or the Bahamas.<br />
We Feds have not yet implemented hard <span class="s1">exchange controls</span> in the USA, but we anticipate our latest step, <span style="color: blue;"><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2014/08/19/ten-facts-about-fatca-americas-manifest-destiny-law-changing-banking-worldwide/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">FATCA</span>,</a></span> coming close to achieving the same effect. With FATCA implementation underway bringing you Americans under our greater control is not a far off goal. We are hard at work making this dream a reality.<br />
No, it is not too late, you can still legally send money offshore. Many of you are <span class="s1"><span style="color: blue;"><a href="http://offshorebanking.wix.com/account-list" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">stashing your money</span> <span style="color: blue;">outside of the USA</span></a></span> in more sound economies to escape the increasing currency and economic weakness here</span>, but soon we’ll stop you. You should have no right to buy CDs denominated in stronger foreign currencies, or stocks in companies that earn their revenue in stronger currencies. We cannot monitor each and every transaction you make from your foreign accounts, so you should have no right. In Nazi Germany ownership of foreign accounts was punishable with death. Soon we’ll change the laws to prevent you from sending money offshore, but for now we are forced to tolerate the few of you with foresight. Doesn’t matter, <a href="http://www.dailypaul.com/330634/the-united-states-is-tryinging-to-prevent-citizens-from-leaving-the-country" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">we’ll trap enough of you in our net soon enough</span></a>.<br />
<br />
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests."<br />
- Patrick Henry</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-17262179486323855242015-02-28T10:05:00.000-08:002015-02-28T10:08:18.517-08:00How We Ripped You Off With Inflation Part II<div class="p1">
Saving up for a new car, home improvement, or college for your children? Have you noticed you’re not making much progress against rising prices? That’s because we tax those savings of yours. Heavily. No, not just the interest, but each and every individual dollar you own. Better rev up your savings plan.<br />
When we at the government decide to print some money to spend we increase the total number of dollars that exist. Supply and demand dictate that when you increase the quantity of anything, its value goes down. Those new dollars that we print and spend get 100% of their value from demand for dollars that already exist, including your dollars. A little bit of the demand for the dollars in your savings migrates from your dollars to our new dollars, and with that demand goes value. Your dollars lose value, ours gain value. You’re none the wiser. If we print and spend enough money to increase the total number of dollars in circulation by 5%, your dollars will, in time, lose 5% of their value. You see this in the form of higher prices, or inflation, as businesses need 5% more dollars to pay their suppliers, rent, etc., and they pass on the higher costs to you. <a href="http://offshorebanking.wix.com/account-list" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">See the graph near the top of this page</span></a> to see how much money our partners at the Federal Reserve have created for us to spend and add to circulation lately. Don’t worry, it can take a few years for our new dollars to work their way into circulation and erode the value of your cash. For us, the benefit is immediate!!<br />
Now, if you have bonds, savings, certificates of deposits, money market accounts, tax lien certificates, or ANY other financial instrument with a fixed dollar value, it will lose value. Your annuity, pension, or other fixed income instrument may never fail to pay you the amount intended, but whether or not that monthly amount comfortably covers your monthly expenses or barely gets you through two weeks is another question. That is why counterfeiting (for anyone besides us) is illegal. Only we at the government are allowed to steal the value of your property. We at the government have <span class="s1">printed quite a bit of money lately (see above link)</span>.<br />
We sell our own treasury debt to you people, taking your money from you while you smile. Of course we’ll pay you back, but in the mean time we’ll print up some money. The dollars we pay you back with will be worth less, maybe much less than the dollars we took from you. This is usually true even after you add in the interest you collected. By the way, we may decide you owe us income tax on that interest.<br />
We tax you heavily by printing money, or “quantitative easing,” as we have come to call it to hide what we are really doing. Jonny’s never going to college; you cannot save fast enough to keep up with the rising tuition costs we cause. <span class="s1" style="background-color: white;"><a href="http://dennis-bradford.com/financial-well-being/stealth-tax" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">You’re not going to beat our stealth taxation</span></a></span>. We do, however, enjoy taking his tuition money, so by all means please keep trying. Can I offer you some risk free Treasury Bills??<br />
<br />
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."<br />
- Thomas Jefferson</div>
<br />
<div class="p2">
<br /></div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-70021783275357533552015-01-31T13:32:00.004-08:002015-02-28T10:24:53.107-08:00How We Ripped You Off With Inflation Part I<br />
<div class="p1">
Don’t worry; inflation over the last 10 years has been very low, according to our official government numbers. Yes, it is true; we have tinkered with the formula we use to come up with the ultra low inflation rate over the years. We actually started making small changes to our method of calculating inflation around 1980. We found that if we manipulated and substituted certain figures like the price increase in food and energy (including gasoline), we could produce a much lower inflation figure!!! <a href="http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Note the comparison between the inflation rates we at the government published vs. the inflation rates over the same time period using the original formula from 1980</span></a>. It’s made us all kinds of your money.<br />
Why would we do this? How do we make money doing this? Well, for one, all of you people on Social Security, your benefits are pegged to inflation. If we say inflation is 2%, but it is actually 6%, you only get one third of the raise you should be getting. We get away with giving you a smaller raise every year, and the cumulative effect of this since 1980 is that <span class="s1">you should be getting at least double</span> what you are getting now. Consider it a 50% tax paid to us on top of the tax we already subject you to. Are you on welfare, unemployment, or some other entitlement program? Same story, you get a smaller raise each year and we keep the difference.<br />
Now consider those of you paying Social Security or income tax to us. The tax brackets are adjusted for inflation every year. If inflation is 4%, but we decide to figure it at 2%, guess what? We only adjust them upwards by 2%, and many more of you move up into higher tax brackets. The cumulative effect of this since 1980 is mountains of your money for us that we were never meant to have.<br />
Do you have something to sell, a stock, or maybe a property that you have held onto for many years? Is it more valuable than when you bought it? Let’s say you bought it in 2000, and sold it in 2010 for a 20% capital “gain,’ or 20% more dollars than your purchase price. As shown at the site above, the <span class="s1">true inflation rate was about 60% from 2000 to 2010, but our published inflation rate was roughly 30%</span> for the same time period. Had the value of your asset not changed, it would be worth 60% more dollars, but its value actually dropped, it just didn’t drop as fast as money. Despite this real loss of value, we assign a capital gains tax you. Our law demands that you pay us tax on your “gain,” that is in reality a loss – a loss even when using our own phony inflation figures!! We don’t care if you are paying capital gains tax on your losses. We will still take our cut from you. It doesn’t matter if many other countries allow their citizens to subtract inflation from capital gains, we do not, and we will not. Imagine how much money we have made over the years!! Imagine how much we could make if we printed money even faster (causing higher inflation) while keeping the official inflation rate very low! See how much <a href="http://www.gold-eagle.com/article/stealth-taxes-consume-stock-gains-retirement-plans-part-1" style="color: blue;" target="_blank">you thought you made but didn't</a>!!<br />
What we get is more of your money, and what you get is less of our money.<br />
Yes, our partners at the Federal Reserve have printed us a lot of money lately. This is how we funded the recent bailouts. See the Federal Reserves own chart showing the monetary base over time near the top of <a href="http://offshorebanking.wix.com/account-list" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">this site</span></a>. When this money works its way into circulation and manifests its extraordinary inflationary effects, think of us, and how much more of your money we’ll be making.<br />
No, the Ron Paul types will not stop us. Too many of you don't even realize what we are doing, much less <a href="http://offshorebanking.wix.com/account-list" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">how to protect yourselves</span></a>. The duping and fleecing of you Americans is laughably easy; it's become our hobby.<br />
<br />
"Permit me to control the currency of a nation and I care not who makes its laws"<br />
- Baron De Rothschild, brainchild of the Federal Reserve Bank.</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-65080213428973808772014-12-26T11:45:00.003-08:002014-12-26T12:09:33.743-08:00Welcome to the Party of Government, the Only Political Party in the USA<br />
<div class="p1">
You think you have a choice, Democrat or Republican. They are entirely different, are they not? Democrats want to raise government revenue by raising tax rates, thus increasing tax revenue by targeting the most prosperous. They want to redistribute these funds back into the USA in the form of services like education, social services, corporate bailouts, infrastructure, the war in Afghanistan, and other projects. This is completely different from Republicans. The GOP wants to <span class="s1"><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/12/06/why-america-is-going-to-miss-the-bush-tax-cuts/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">raise taxes by lowering tax rates</span></a></span>, broadening the tax base, and growing the economy. Republicans want to redistribute these funds back into the USA in the form of services like education, social services, corporate bailouts, infrastructure, wars, and other projects. Democrats want to focus on controlling the way you do business, and how you spend your money by regulating most industries. Republicans focus on passing laws focused on controlling your personal lives, such as laws against placing unauthorized substances in your bodies. Both parties support the taking of control over your lives from you and granting it to us at the government. Both parties support the taking of increasing amounts of money from you people for our purposes; they only differ on the method. A vote for one of the two parties is a vote for bigger, stronger government. You only get to choose the method of growth, or the method by which we further erode your freedoms.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
Consider one of your recent presidential elections. The fact that McCain and Obama had remarkably similar <span class="s1"><a href="http://www.senate.gov/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Senate voting records</span></a> </span>is a strong indicator of the similarities between each party’s nominee. Any review of recent history will indicate that Obama’s behavior in office increasingly resembles that of his predecessor. Do you really think McCain would have been all that different? McCain and Obama’s primary difference began and ended in their rhetoric. </div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
What this boils down to is each party selling you Americans different justifications to reach the same end. Our end. That way people of different political views will vote for and enthusiastically support causes that benefit us. It is a rather brilliant strategy. The USSR attempted to run elections within an overtly single party state, and they failed. There's an old corporate trick of marketing the same product under different brand names to appeal to different markets; GM has mastered this and simultaneously capitalized on several different consumer bases. The not-so-obvious-merging-of-the-two-parties method we at the US Federal Government are currently employing is working even better; we in Government have made both political parties our two primary marketing arms, harnessing support from persons of all different views and focusing it on us, entirely for our greater empowerment. You have no real choice among candidates other than to support our agenda at the Government, and you people are too stupid to realize it. Keep on fighting with those in the other party; it keeps you people motivated and ultimately fighting for us, and donate your time and $ to us.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
You Americans are left with just one party; the party of government. The Government Party supports an ever increasing Federal Government in terms of function, size, revenue, and power exercised over the US civilian population. We may say otherwise, but actions speak louder than words.<br />
<br />
Now you know why nothing ever changes no matter who you people elect. Our man always wins.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br /></div>
<div class="p1">
</div>
<div class="p1">
A lady asked Dr. Franklin Well Doctor what have we got a republic or a monarchy — "A republic," replied the Doctor, "if you can keep it."<br />
- Anonymous, from Farrand's Records of the Federal Convention of 1787</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-11300502169637315572014-12-07T09:05:00.000-08:002015-01-01T00:31:46.397-08:00We Put You Right Back Into The Caste System Your Ancestors Fled<br />
<div class="p1">
Your ascendants left England to, among other reasons, escape the caste system. Your ascendants were locked into a system in which there was no upward mobility. They were stuck as peasants in a system that considered them inferior and did not recognize their rights as human beings, but instead assigned them limited privileges based on their low caste. The severity of a crime was determined by not just by the crime itself, but by the difference in caste between the offender and offended. Guess what; we put you back into a caste system here in the USA, and you didn’t even notice.<br />
You don’t believe me? Consider assault. </div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
Assault is a crime. We at the government usually choose to enforce laws against assaulting US citizens, although assault against a person higher up in the caste system is prosecuted much more aggressively. Commit assault against a police officer or other government employee, and we will show you exactly how aggressively we enforce the law and prosecute those who commit crimes against us. Our new royalty, those persons holding or who have held high public offices, often enjoy the protection of law enforcement personnel who exist entirely to protect their cast. Look up the many laws against assaulting government employees and see how broadly “assault” is defined.<br />
<br />
Now, consider assault against a citizen by a police officer.<span style="background-color: white;"> The <a href="http://sdvoice.info/police-brutality-cases-on-the-rise-again-why-are-law-enforcement-officials-out-of-control/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">vast majority of police brutality cases are never prosecuted</span></a> because the prosecution, or government, tends to favor its own government people which includes police officers. We have a legal system i</span>n place which exempts police officers from what would normally be considered an unprovoked violent assault. “Roughing up” a suspect during an arrest is even encouraged at times. We at the government tend to be one big happy family, and family is always loyal to family.<br />
<br />
The caste system in the USA is as follows:<br />
<br />
<b>1st caste</b>: Politicians and political appointees. They enjoy the<br />
highest degree of legal protection and privilege for life.<br />
<br />
<b>2nd caste</b>: Government employees. They generally live<br />
comfortable lives with secure lifetime income at the<br />
expense of the 3rd caste. They also enjoy significant<br />
legal protection.<br />
<br />
<b>3rd caste</b>: US private citizens. This is the labor caste. Their work<br />
is responsible for all economic productivity. Every other caste is<br />
dependent on the taxes extorted from the private citizens. We </div>
<div class="p1">
permit them to keep a portion of their income to keep them </div>
<div class="p1">
motivated to work hard for us.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
<b>4th caste</b>: Inmates. This consists almost entirely of members<br />
of the 3rd caste who were demoted by members of the 2nd caste<br />
acting under the laws made by the 1st caste.<br />
<br />
You have been conditioned by us to accept the above terms. Imagine how you would react to seeing a fleeing person suspected of theft tackled on pavement and placed forcefully under arrest. Now imagine your reaction if the arresting person was a Wal-Mart employee tackling and restraining someone he thought was a shop lifter. Your government given bias allows the police officer to “do his job,” but you would never allow one of your own to do the same. You hardly blink an eye when the first caste is permitted to bypass our TSA screening process, or mismanage vast sums of public funds without consequence. Welcome to the caste system. You know your place and you fit right in.</div>
<div class="p1">
Did you know your <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/10/how-team-obama-justifies-the-killing-of-a-16-year-old-american/264028/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">president is now <span class="s1">permitted to assassinate human beings</span> at will</span></a>? That’s right, the days of the King’s ability to arbitrarily kill you are back. He is free to <a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/7775-feds-grant-permission-to-challenge-targeting-of-us-citizens" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;"><span class="s1">order the deaths of US Citizens</span> at his sole discretion</span></a>, without a conviction, due process, or even an accusation. Even us down here in the 2nd caste are free to <a href="http://thefreethoughtproject.com/cops-beat-wives-girlfriends-double-national-rate-receive-promotions/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">violently beat our 3rd caste wives</span></a> with minimal interference. Your constitution cannot protect you.<br />
<br />
History affords us many instances of the ruin of states, by the prosecution of measures ill suited to the temper and genius of their people. The ordaining of laws in favor of one part of the nation, to the prejudice and oppression of another, is certainly the most erroneous and mistaken policy. An equal dispensation of protection, rights, privileges, and advantages, is what every part is entitled to, and ought to enjoy... These measures never fail to create great and violent jealousies and animosities between the people favored and the people oppressed; whence a total separation of affections, interests, political obligations, and all manner of connections, by which the whole state is weakened.<br />
- Benjamin Franklin, Emblematical Representations, Circa 1774</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-44689632432844129142014-11-16T09:53:00.002-08:002014-11-16T09:55:00.857-08:00We Federal Employees Are Worth Double What You Are Worth<div class="p1">
It is true, we Federal Employees are worth <span class="s1">much more</span> than you, and that is why you pay us <span class="s1" style="color: blue;"><a href="http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/economy/income/2010-08-10-1afedpay10_st_n.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">TWO TIMES</span></a> </span>what you private sector government subjects are paid. Numbers don’t lie. Take a look at our superior and well earned <a href="http://www.federaljobs.net/benefits.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">benefits and retirement packages</span></a>. The laws we have made cause you to be irrevocably obligated to pay us for the invaluable services we perform, or else. </div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
Whether you admit it or not, that is what motivates you subjugated people in the "land of the free" to pay us. The truth may be that the only real service we sell you is allowing you to keep whatever portion of your income we permit, your belongings, and not confining you to a federal prison. You people consider our services so invaluable that most of you believe you owe us a debt of gratitude and loyalty on top of your hard earned money. You even pay us through wage withholding, allowing us to take your money before you ever receive it. Wage withholding effectively promotes us above all your other financial priorities, even above feeding you own children. We appreciate the gratitude you express to us for the services we provide, it’s what keeps us in power over you. We keep you working hard for us.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
A rigid economy of the public contributions and absolute interdiction of all useless expenses will go far towards keeping the government honest and unoppressive.<br />
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Lafayette, 1823</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-23875492123652991572014-11-08T09:17:00.001-08:002014-11-08T09:21:45.265-08:00We Are Exempt From Your Morality<br />
<div class="p1">
Knock, knock, knock on your front door (should we decide to give you the courtesy of a knock), then we break down the door and come in like a sudden flood, using lethal force on anyone who resists, often killing the family pet should he dare to bark at us. Using physical force and the threat of violence we quickly subdue the occupants of the house and take them off to jail.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
Ordinary citizens are not permitted by law or the culture to resort to violence in response to a non violent act, but you have no problem with us doing so. We have slowly increased this practice over the decades, effectively conditioning you to reject the idea that our thuggish behavior is thuggish. We have your respect and gratitude as we drag a person suspected of placing a substance in his body that we do not approve of off to jail. </div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
You recently elected a man who helped create a law that now forces every American resident to become a customer of the Medical Insurance industry, or carry a government health insurance plan. This law is such that you must choose between being a customer of one of the governments chosen business, or paying heavy fines and potentially going to prison. Judging by the lack of resistance from you, you have no problem with us fining and imprisoning you for not purchasing services as we direct. </div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
Imagine if a satellite television provider tried this. Imagine if they fined, and, in severe cases kidnapped and placed in their private jail persons who refused to sign up for their service. You people would consider this a very serious crime, and beg us to rescue you, but when we do exactly the same to you you don’t give it a second thought. Many of you even cheer us on.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
You are ok accepting abuses like this from us at the government. You have been conditioned to believe that normal morality which forbids violence, extortion, and requires general respect for another adults ability to make their own decisions does not apply to us. You frown heavily on the participant in a conflict who is the first to sink so low as to become violent, unless that first person is one of us. You have no problem with our violent responses to non violent crimes in which our victims are in no way a threat to public safety, and you do not even allow your own citizens the right to resist us. The exemption from ordinary right vs. wrong moral judgments makes it so much easier to control you people in “the land of the free.”<br />
<br />
"(terror means) killing and robbery and coercion by people who <b>do not have state authority</b> and go beyond national borders".<br />
- Bill Clinton<br />
<br />
What country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.<br />
– Thomas Jefferson</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-70448227515712557942014-11-02T09:44:00.002-08:002014-11-02T09:51:59.686-08:00"Tax the Rich, Corporations, and ..." You people always fall for that one.“The IRS is there to help us, it enables the government to give money to poor people who need it more than rich people and corporations.”<br />
<div class="p1">
<br />
That’s right, go on believing that when we take your hard earned money it is just like donating to charity. You can sleep well believing that you are a good person for paying your "fair" share, for being good little Americans beaten into submission by IRS employees. Never mind the fact that Congress always allows sufficient loopholes for themselves and the rest of the super rich, effectively lowering or eliminating their taxes. Look the other way when we continue expanding the definition of "rich" to include more and more of you, until everybody with full time work is rich and forced to pay us as we deem appropriate. Never even consider that taxes actually cause much more harm than good to all economic classes; this is all just extremist propaganda.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
According to Dr. Dale Jorgenson, chairman of the Harvard Economics Department, an average of <a href="http://fairtax.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/FairTaxFAQ.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;"><span class="s1">22 percent</span> of the price of consumer goods</span></a> and services represents the costs of federal taxes and tax compliance costs paid by producers and suppliers in the process of making the product. Ultimately these costs are passed on to and paid by the consumer in the form of higher prices. We know from basic economics that once a cost is removed industry wide, competition will push the price down by the amount of the removed cost in a very short time. The net result of eliminating federal taxes would be a nation wide across the board drop in consumer prices by about 22%. This would in effect give the poor a 22% raise, or more for those earning enough to pay income tax. </div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
What we have helped you forget is that there is only 1 taxpayer, the US economy. Taxing the economy, be it the rich, the corporations, or anybody else harms every member of that economy one way or another.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
“But what about the government!?!?” you ask as we marvel at how well we trained you good little americans to look out for us. Even as we extort money from you to further fund our infringement of the freedoms you people fought for your concern is still for us. Like the woman who not only returns to, but defends her abusive "lover."</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
Without an individual or income tax or social security taxes the budget could be balanced with <span style="color: blue;"><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals" style="background-color: white;" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">current revenue levels from other sources</span></a> </span>if the government were reduced in size to where it was in the 1970s. Current revenue from the gasoline, alcohol, tobacco taxes, and other sources would be enough to <span class="s1">fund all federal services as they were in 1972 with a small surplus</span>. Yes, 1972 was prior to the fall of the USSR. Subtract the mile high USSR induced portion of the defense budget and you just might account for inflation between 72 and the present. If you leave social security in place you can fund government at roughly 1990 levels. Don't worry, we in government will always ensure we take enough of your resources to continually increase the level of policing you people are subject to; we will never again give you the freedom you had in the 70's and 80's.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
In addition, if the working poor were given the opportunity to opt out of social security, they would have an additional 6.2% in savings, increasing the total savings rate to 28%. Rest assured, we will do everything with the power we took from you to make sure you are never given the opportunity to vote for such Ron Paul types.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br />
Know that Dr. Dale Jorgenson will be paying his “fair” share of income tax until the day he dies.<br />
<br />
“The best way to put more money in people's wallets is to leave it there in the first place.”<br />
- Edwin Feulner<br />
<br /></div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-34600791104580914092014-10-18T10:44:00.000-07:002014-10-18T10:44:53.324-07:00No, You Haven't Got a House
<br />
<div class="p1">
Homeownership, just pay off that mortgage and the house is all yours, right? Wrong. You will never be done paying because the house you call your home is not yours. </div>
<div class="p1">
<br /></div>
<div class="p1">
If you must pay someone money on a regular basis to avoid being evicted from your home, are you truly a homeowner? What if that same organization that you pay money to under threat of eviction also controls your use of the property? What if they forbid you to run a store from your home, or allow a second family to move in, and enforce such with zoning laws? What if they also prevent you from making any significant modifications to the property without their written permission, in the form of PERmit requirements? Is the home really yours?</div>
<div class="p1">
<br /></div>
<div class="p1">
You are not able to add, subtract, or modify any structures on “your” property without permission from us in government. You cannot use the property for purposes we don't approve of. You must pay us money on a regular basis so we don't toss you and your family out of "your" home and onto the street. Does this sound like any common sense definition of the word ownership? You might hold legal title to the property, but do you really own it in the above circumstances?</div>
<div class="p1">
<br /></div>
<div class="p1">
What you have is in effect a never ending transferable lease. You Americans think you will someday own your homes in the land of the free. It is in this very land of the free that you don’t even realize what has happened. Your homes have been taken from you. Through a slow erosion of your property rights you have become tenants in your own homes, renting them from their confiscators and true owners, the states and local governments.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br /></div>
<div class="p1">
In spite of your Federal Constitutions 5th amendment we in government have effectively confiscated your homes and rented them back to you right here in the land of the free, and you didn't even notice!! We deserve even more credit for pulling one over on you because this was the case WHILE we had you all riled up about resisting a Communist (read USSR) takeover!! </div>
<div class="p1">
<br /></div>
<div class="p1">
You stupid little americans; you deserve to have lost your homes to us. </div>
<div class="p1">
<br /></div>
<div class="p1">
<br /></div>
<div class="p1">
Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions. </div>
<div class="p1">
- James Madison</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-82484024876640335252014-10-12T21:44:00.000-07:002014-10-18T10:45:26.687-07:00Just The Way You Wanted It<br />
<div class="p1">
</div>
<div class="p1">
It is a crime for you Americans to save what you earn. You must first and foremost pay us what we have decided you owe us. You must hand this money over before you buy food for your children, even before it arrives in your bank account. Your employer will cooperate with us to make sure you never get a chance to handle the money you owe us.<br />
<br />
You people like it this way. You voted away your money when we promised you various benefits in return for your money. You never got these promises in writing, and the conditions were such that you had to keep paying us regardless of when, how, or even if the benefits are ever delivered to you. You signed away your right to withhold your tax payments under the above terms over and over again. You cannot even withhold your own money in protest, yet you keep working for us to get that little bit of your own money that we allow you to keep, that little commission we use to motivate you. Peaceful resistance is not possible for you; that’s the way you wanted it.<br />
<br />
Are you enjoying your government benefits? Do you feel you are getting your moneys worth? Who cares? You sure don’t, and even if you did you would keep paying anyway. Either way, we get to keep your money and use it however we please. We’ve done quite well with it, by the way. As you can see <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2012/01/31/government-workers-earns-more-than-private-sector/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">here</span></a> we are earning more than you with money we took from you. We deserve it.<br />
<br />
I wish to thank you. You save us the trouble of invoicing you by filing out your form 1040 every year. It would be a lot of work for us, and we would have to use some of the money we take from you to accomplish this. Instead, you pay about $1,000 and 25 hours per person annually to take care of this for us, allowing us to focus our efforts on taking more of your money. With roughly <span class="s1"><a href="http://taxfoundation.org/blog/how-many-words-are-tax-code" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">70,000 pages</span></a> + Obamacare</span> in all it is easy for you to make a mistake, and lucrative for us when you do. Our penalty rates are very high. In fact, they amount to usury, and if we had to follow state laws I have no doubt our penalties would be illegal in many States. We are the Federal government. We can do what we want.<br />
<br />
<br />
“Indeed, in a free government almost all other rights would become worthless if the government possessed power over the private fortune of every citizen.”<br />
- John Marshall</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-23092482143965449812014-10-04T15:09:00.001-07:002014-10-18T10:45:37.316-07:00Tea Party? HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<div class="p1">
The Boston Tea Party was a protest of a consumption tax that applied only to 1 item that nobody needed. The men who carried out the “Tea Party” risked prison on order to protest this tax which they viewed as unjust.</div>
<div class="p1">
<br /></div>
<div class="p2">
Things like this don’t happen anymore. Today, if the Tea Partiers were to muster up enough courage to, say for example burn down an empty liquor store or two in protest of the federal alcohol and income tax, it would be big news. The American spirit that inspired the Boston Tea Party resides in exceedingly few Americans today, most of you are content to sit in your homes and watch television. You see, we have been conditioning you thru that same television to think a certain way, to accept our ideas, and think as we would like you to think. We took over public education in the early 70’s to get a head start, and eliminate the influence of the local communities on public schools. We taught you to be good little Americans while slowly removing civics, the bill of rights, etc. from the curriculum. Military intelligence calls this an IO, or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Operations_(United_States)" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Information Operations</span></a> campaign. We use it on foreign populations to get them to accept US troops and the conditions we impose on them, and to direct their hostility towards those who oppose us. It works just as well on you people. </div>
<div class="p2">
<br />
We have you convinced that not paying taxes in a country born in a tax revolt is somehow shamefully unpatriotic. This is true even though most of you see that billions are, at best, misused, and, at worst, trillions are wasted. The fact that about <a href="http://www.nowandfutures.com/taxes.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">one half of your hard earned income</span></a> goes to us in government thru various forms of taxation would be abhorrent to the original Americans of the early 1800s. You Americans of the early 2000’s like it this way. You are happy when we imprison one of your own for attempting to keep more than his “fair share” of his own hard earned money. You voted for a man who forced you to either sign up for various corporate insurance programs or face heavy fines and possible prison, and you loved him. Of course if the local News Paper company was given the authority to fine, and even imprison people who were not subscribers you would be irate, and fiercely stand up for your rights and freedom against this injustice. When this same action is taken by us, the government, you may go so far as to express your disapproval to your neighbors but would never have the courage to actually stand up for yourselves. You will not even think to question why you allow us to take such liberties when dealing with you.</div>
<div class="p2">
<br />
We have IOed you into a state of perceived helplessness – you feel as if you cannot possibly take care of yourself with out us stepping in and protecting you from your own bad judgment.<br />
<br />
<br />
"... God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty.... And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."<br />
- Thomas Jefferson</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2122130750786182082.post-28180812688638806532014-09-27T13:14:00.004-07:002014-10-18T10:48:29.151-07:00Lie to us, go to jail. We lie to you….NOTHING!!!!<br />
<div class="p1">
The state of New Jersey knowingly published <b><a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-152.htm" style="background-color: white;" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">fraudulent financial statements</span></a></b><span style="background-color: white;"> in </span>order to attract bond investors. Normally when we catch one of you producing misleading information in order to attract investment dollars (remember Enron, WorldCom, or Bernie Madoff?) we destroy them. You gratefully reward us with even more dependence and trust. This time, it was one of our own ripping you off. What did we at the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) do to the State of New Jersey? Virtually NOTHING. We did what amounts to NOTHING on your behalf. Not one person was indicted or even subject to disciplinary action by the SEC or the State of New Jersey. We did not fine them one single dollar. We did not require them to return one dime to the defrauded investors. We allow them to not only stay in business with no change to their oversight, but to SELL ADDITIONAL BONDS NOT 24 HOURS LATER!! Since we set this precedence, we thought we'd continue when another government <a href="http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370542629913#.VCcYRymN8aA" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;"><b>did the same</b></span></a> to your poor saps. Guess what we're going to do to our buddies in Kansas? <b><a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/intfinlaw/2014/08/states-and-cities-committing-securities-fraud-.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">Look how often we go after you now</span></a>,</b> and you people still thing we work for you! Government first and foremost takes care of government.<br />
<br />
We have revoked your Constitutional 5th amendment right against self incrimination <a href="http://www.irs.gov/uac/Facts-&-Fiction-of-Frivolous-Arguments---Nonfiler-Enforcement" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;"><b>when facing the IRS</b></span></a>. Telling an IRS auditor that you have a right to not answer any questions about your tax situation will get you nowhere. "Innocent until proven guilty" does not apply to IRS audits. If you invoke the 5th amendment instead of proving your innocence, we simply assume guilt and send you a bill for the new assessment. We’re about to get a <span class="s1">lot tougher</span>. Lying to an IRS auditor can get you thrown in prison, but you must trust us to police ourselves when it comes to our own truthfulness. You will never be permitted to audit our financial statements, by the way.<br />
<br />
US history is full of our lies; from the numerous treaties made to Native Americans, to promises to repay war bonds in gold, to detaining Japanese Americans in the 40’s. Imagine a person with a truthfulness record as bad as ours promising you some guarantee such as a retirement through Social Security. If you placed one ounce of trust in this person’s word concerning anything that mattered, a neutral observer would certainly consider your actions epically foolish. Where we win is in the fact that, despite our lies and abuses, we still have your trust. In fact many of you associate patriotism with loyalty to us at the government, motivating you to defend out actions with a religious fervor regardless of how hideous they may be.<br />
<br />
We <span class="s1"><a href="http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2010/06/18/myth-2-cops-cant-lie/" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;"><b>can, will, and do lie to you</b></span></a> </span>with few restrictions, but we imprisoned Martha Stewart for lying to us. We reserve the right do the same to you.<br />
<br />
<br />
All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree.<br />
- James Madison, speech at the Constitutional Convention, July 11, 1787</div>
youareproperty.blogspot.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01316004461503197926noreply@blogger.com0